| Sri Prabhakaran, Kurumbi Veedu, Attapuram, Kulathoor, Uchakada and five other consumers with consumer Nos. 10407, 10651, 10655, 10581, 10686 and 10748 under Electrical Section, Parassala had approached CGRF (South), Kottarakkara with a petition stands numbered as 1622/2015 requesting not to disconnect their service connections until the disposal of OS 456/2010 by the Munsiff Court, Neyyattinkara. The service connections were given to the above consumers on the basis of ownership certificate issued by the Secretary, Kulathoor Grama Panchayath. Meanwhile, Sri Sunil Kumar, Padmanabha Soudam, Kulathoor, appellant in this petition, raised a complaint on 26-09-2014 before the Deputy Chief Engineer, Electrical Circle, Kattakkada stating that the service connections in question were obtained illegally on production of fake ownership certificate. Hence he requested to dismantle the service connections mentioned above.
Regulation 22 (d) states that “Maintainability of the Complaint‐ (1) no representation to the Ombudsman shall lie in case where a representation for the same grievance by the complainant is pending in any proceedings before any Court, tribunal or arbitrator or any other authority or a decree or award or a final order has already been passed by any such Court, tribunal, arbitrator or authority”. So in view of the above discussions, I hold that the appeal is not maintainable.
In the above circumstances it is concluded that the appeal is not maintainable and hence dismissed. No order as to costs. |
|
|
Data
|
| Size |
290.96 KB |
| Downloads |
1125 |
| Created |
2016-07-20 00:00:00 |
|
|
|
Overview
Search Downloads
Submit file
Up
P/024/2016 Sri. Sunil Kumar, Thiruvananthapuram. 